- #You dont know js confusing skin
- #You dont know js confusing code
While changes are being made, it is incorrect to say that "Only public domain resources can be copied exactly-this does not include most web pages." It would be better to say that "Only public domain resources can be copied without permission-this does not include most web pages." Superm401 | Talk 20:37, 13 January 2006 (UTC) Let me do this incrementally.well, here's the first one. I also think the top line should be kept in some form.
You must cite the sources for your edits so others can verify your work.ĭan100 said the the link to "cite sources" was a duplicate, but now at least, there is no replacement. The community is quick to enforce the quality standards on all articles. You are encouraged to create and improve articles. I'm a bit concerned about the text that was removed in this edit, which I just noticed. Denelson 83 07:15, 14 January 2006 (UTC) Mistaken Removal c 03:53, 14 January 2006 (UTC) - Locke Cole ĭo you think we could add a section for other commonly-used Unicode symbols, such as ← ↑ → ↓ and ♠ ♣ ♦ ♥ ?. The only way to keep the special character boxes from showing at all would be to add them via javascript entirely (presumably anyone with javascript turned on likely also has CSS?). #You dont know js confusing code
Could you check out my code below and let me know if it might help? Nevermind, it won't. You seem to be forgetting the people who have neither javascript nor CSS, since your hiding is CSS-based. People who don't have javascript or monobook only see one line. It's not a huge monstrosity anymore, and it doesn't flicker anymore. 
Some browsers have neither Javascript nor CSS, and Wikipedia should work fine on them.
But before, even without Javascript or CSS, the box was small, instead of being a huge monstrosity. The characters would never insert without javascript. Why does this depend on javascript now? What if you use a non java script browser or sirf with js disabled? Mike 16:39, 13 January 2006 (UTC). Obviously, the best solution would be to change every skin's Javascript (since there's no common JS). If that's the chosen solution, you should add it to every skin's CSS (there is a list at Mediawiki talk:Common.css. specialbasic That will cause nothing but the first line to load. For people not using javascript or monobook, they can add to their CSS file the following:. If there's "something wrong" with it, please fix it. I only copied and pasted this from the French Wikipedia. Can you code these? I don't know javascript. A fix to everything else, including the bloat, would be to create the box dynamically instead of loading it even for the ones who do not have Javascript enabled. 
This of course means one needs Javascript to use the other pages, but then this whole thing already needs Javascript to insert the tags. A fix to both the dependency on Javascript and the flicker would be to, instead of displaying everything first and then hiding almost all of it, already hide everything but the first page by default. Think of the people on dialup (it's not as uncommon as you might want to think it is). Also, did you look at the size of the code this generates? This part of the edit page is huge, and you just bloated it even more. If it flickers while loading (as this one does), you did something wrong.
#You dont know js confusing skin
If it only works on one skin (because you didn't add the code to the other skins), you are doing something wrong. If it depends on Javascript to become small, you are doing something wrong. If it looks like a giant list to you, you need to do one or all of the above. The box should be smaller than the previous character box, not a giant list.
You have gone to MediaWiki:Monobook.js and hit CTRL+F5 to refresh. You are using Monobook (not sure what it looks like in other skins). 18 Characters won't insert at all on Safari?. 11 Language bit needs to be in separate javascript file.
0 kommentar(er)
